Compare
qckfx vs Maestro
Overview
Maestro
Maestro uses YAML-defined test flows.
qckfx
qckfx records real simulator sessions and replays them deterministically.
Key Differences
Test Definition
Maestro
YAML scripts define expected behavior.
qckfx
Real usage becomes replay.
Maintenance
Maestro
YAML must evolve with UI changes.
qckfx
Replays highlight diffs without maintaining DSL files.
Workflow
Maestro
Define flows, then run tests.
qckfx
Use the app (human or agent), record, and replay.
When Maestro Is a Better Fit
- —You prefer declarative test definitions.
- —You need cross-platform support.
When qckfx Is a Better Fit
- —You want minimal authoring overhead.
- —You want deterministic replay baselines.
- —You want recorded flows to serve as regression checkpoints.
See How It Works
Watch qckfx record and replay a real simulator session — no test code required.
How qckfx worksDocumentation
Get started with recording your first flow, setting up MCP for agent workflows, and more.
Read the docs